Brave new world. There are mornings you want to be saved reading the news, saved reading and watching the villain, the vilified politician of the month, former Vice Defense Minister Moriyami brought to prison, saved reading about Miyazaki prefecture's governor Hideo Higashikokubaru musing aloud in a public meeting about the needs to a one to two years military service (re)instated in Japan. Or what about this one: "A group of Japanese cities with communities of non-Japanese residents called on the central government in a conference Wednesday to establish a national registry to help improve keeping track of foreign residents who move localities." Municipalities are loosing track of some foreigners who do not log in at the local authorities when moving towns. What the local registries have been incompetent at dealing with, a national registry will. Of course, these utterances are spilled most probably in good faith for the good of the community at large. But what about the grounding thinking that support those concerns? What about the collaterals? Why not jump a step further ahead right away and call for the RFID tagging of foreigners, including visitors at the gate? No more fingerprinting. A shot in the arm and welcome to Japan. Implant chips to identify the livings. Track them on GPS, radar screens swarming with blinking dots. Call Hollywood, I have story.
28.11.07
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)







6 comments:
RFID? That's what WalMart uses to track packages and streamline it's operations, right?
Maybe two evil empires can partner for the new project(WalMart and the Japanese government) and sign the deal in blood.
I laugh and I cry...
It's not as far-fetched as it sounds. On the surface, the plan asks for a national registration programme. The thing is, the onus is still on the foreign resident to update their residence information, whether handled at the local level (as it is now) or a Japan-wide system. So, a national registration plan will do nothing... unless something is included in the plan to take the onus OFF the NJ resident. That's where RFID chips come in, most likely imbedded in gaijin cards. That way, anytime a NJ enters a community, RFID readers positioned in the area can determine immediately the status and place of residence of the person entering. If a foreigner were to be located in a ward for a period of weeks other than the stated place of residence, the matter could be easily investigated by the authorities to determine if there is a foreign national who has not yet registered as a new resident with the ward office. This, as the article suggests will be to benefit the foreign national who may be "being left out of local administrative services".
While we're at it, why don't we include a urine sample with our fingerprints? You know the government's going to want it eventually.
I have no doubt that there is no evil intention with the administration. But proper information should usually suffice. And I do agree that a national registration plan would do nothing. The administration is especially bad at dispatching information, including in foreign languages although they do a lot of efforts sometimes. They are producing a lot of papers, including interesting stuff you discover by chance one day you stop at the ward office.
"This, as the article suggests will be to benefit the foreign national who may be 'being left out of local administrative services'"
local administrative services? :)
I suppose.
I have doubts about them worrying that foreigners are "being left out" though.
I would guess that the shiyakusho that is over the ward they move to wants its tax money. Which is only fair and the law.
I don't know why they don't call it like it is?
//
The same with the fingerprinting. Just say "we want to keep track of foreigners in Japan (like we used to) because we are xenophobes, etc." If the real reason was purely to curb terrorism does it make sense not to fingerprint Japanese too?
There are Japanese who fall into all kinds of groups and ideologies. Is it so inconceivable that a Japanese could be a terrorist? Or are we to forget the chemical terrorism attacks of 1995?
Wasn't there an American taliban member? Why not a Japanese?
No. terrorists can only be foreigners. Japan says so. Well, that's government for you.
Man, you people are SLOW. When was the last time you renewed your passport? Here's a hint guys: ALL NEW PASSPORTS ARE RFID EMBEDDED ON THE BACK PAGE.
The UK government issued mine last year. You can tell the difference by the funny symbol the front and by the obvious RFID chip in the back.
Seriously, grow up and stop complaining would you? Why dont you direct that energy into something useful, like banning religion which is the very cause of all this terrorism in the first place... or saving the world and the diversity of animal species.
Post a Comment